Leaked trade talk documents reveal threat to environment

3rd May 2016


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Adaptation ,
  • Mitigation ,
  • Renewable

Author

Karen Fisher

Protection of the environment and human health would be eriously undermined' if negotiations between the US and EU on a transatlantic trade deal continue on the current path, Greenpeace warned.

The campaign group has published leaked parts of the draft text of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), currently being negotiated between the US government and the European Commission.

TTIP aims to remove non-tariff obstacles to trade between the EU and US, focusing on harmonising rules and regulations between the two blocs. Talks on the agreement have been underway for two and a half years.

Campaigners have accused the negotiations of being shrouded in secrecy and last year the European Ombudsman published a report urging the commission to improve transparency.

Greenpeace said the leaked text represents more than two-thirds of the overall draft deal. Of the 16 chapters it has obtained, 13 are ‘consolidated’ and show the negotiating positions of both blocs. They reveal areas of agreement and also where compromise may be necessary.

The campaign group has access to chapters on chemicals, agriculture, government procurement, regulatory cooperation and technical barriers to trade, such as labelling. Chapters it does not have access to include those covering energy and raw materials, investment protection, legal and institutional issues, subsidies and sustainable development.

Greenpeace’s concerns include:

  • The chapter on regulation aims to reconcile EU and US regulations, irrespective of the issue at stake. It states that regulations that are stricter on one side than the other will be scrutinised and revised.
  • On agriculture, the EU wants the agreement to state that nothing will restrain the parties from taking action to achieve policy objectives, including public health, safety and environment. However, the US describes such measures as ‘trade distorting’ and is advocating lower standards.
  • Proposals to remove technical barriers to trade include allowing industry unprecedented access to the regulatory processes of each member state – for example, on the labelling of hazardous products.
  • Climate protection is not mentioned in the draft text seen by Greenpeace. The organisation believes the scope for mitigation measures could be limited by provisions in the chapters on regulatory cooperation or market access for industrial goods – for example, the proposals would rule out regulating the import of CO2-intensive fuels, such as oil from tar sands.
  • The precautionary principle is not mentioned in any of the draft text. The principle is enshrined in EU law and states that, where a policy or action might cause harm to the public or environment and there is no scientific consensus on the issue, the policy or action should not be pursued. However, the US is demanding a ‘risk-based approach’, which manages hazardous substances rather than avoids them.
  • Both parties are considering giving corporations more access and participation in decision-making. The documents show that corporations have been given significant opportunities to participate in the decision-making process, Greenpeace says. By contrast, civil society bodies have had little access to the negotiations. Campaign groups have been allowed to take part in consultations and stakeholder meetings conducted by the commission, but Greenpeace describes these as ‘little more than content-free formalities’.

Jorgo Riss, director of Greenpeace EU, said: ‘The effects of TTIP would be initially subtle but ultimately devastating. It would lead to European laws being judged on their consequences for trade and investment, disregarding environmental protection and public health concerns.’

The EU trade commission Cecilia Malmström stressed that the leaked documents merely reflect each side’s negotiating position and said there were many areas where the EU and US have different views. ‘In areas where we are too far apart in a negotiation, we simply will not agree,’ she wrote in a blog.

Malmström denied that industry had had greater access to EU negotiating positions than other stakeholders, adding that trade unions, consumer groups and health and environmental organisations are represented in the advisory group that regularly meets the commission’s negotiating team.

‘It begs to be said, again and again: no EU trade agreement will ever lower our level of protection of consumers, or food safety, or of the environment. Trade agreements will not change our laws on GMOs, or how to produce safe beef, or how to protect the environment,’ she said, adding that regulations would only be changed to make them stronger, not weaker.

In response, Riss called Malmström disingenuous. ‘Malmström may well promise not to undermine environmental and consumer protection, but the evidence tells a different story. In several areas the US proposes to lower EU standards, but there are no EU proposals in the leaked consolidated documents to counter this,’ he said.

The leaked documents can be seen here.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Facing the climate emergency challenge in local government

It’s well recognised that the public sector has the opportunity to work towards a national net-zero landscape that goes well beyond improving on its own performance; it can also influence through procurement and can direct through policy.

19th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) strategy is based on optimistic techno-economic assumptions that are now outdated, Carbon Tracker has warned.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s latest Public Attitudes Tracker has found broad support for efforts to tackle climate change, although there are significant concerns that bills will rise.

13th March 2024

Read more

Multinational corporations are undermining their net-zero commitments with excessive air travel and no plans to reduce ‘the low hanging fruit’ of carbon footprints, a study by Transport & Environment has found.

13th March 2024

Read more

The UK government’s climate adaptation plans are ‘inadequate’ and falling ‘far short’ of what is required, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) has warned today.

13th March 2024

Read more

Large businesses across the world are avoiding climate action due to fear they will be called out for getting their work wrong, according to a new Carbon Trust report.

29th February 2024

Read more

A thought-provoking discussion on how storytelling can change the world took place in Central London last night, alongside an exclusive sneak preview of an upcoming IEMA film series.

29th February 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close