Compromise agreed over EIA Directive

3rd January 2014


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Local government ,
  • Construction ,
  • Consultancy

Author

Joan Ching Man Wong

The European parliament has dropped its plans to mandate environmental impact assessments for shale gas projects in an agreement to finalise the new directive

After a fourth round of negotiations in December between the European parliament, the commission and the committee representing the 28 member states, a compromise agreement has been reached on the text for the new EIA Directive.

While the full draft text is not publicly available, IEMA has learned that a proposal by MEPs to amend annex I and mandate EIA for all unconventional oil and gas extraction projects has been withdrawn as a part of the compromise.

With the parliament in favour of further broadening the revisions proposed by the European commission in October 2012 and the council advocating fewer changes, there had been concerns that an agreement on the new directive would be delayed until after the European parliamentary elections in May.

The compromise agreement means that the text now only needs to be formally approved by the European parliament, with the plenary vote expected in the next three months, and then by the council.

“We tried to find a rational solution within the council and with the European parliament, which would improve the quality and compatibility of EIA processes in the EU,” commented Valentinas Mazuronis, environment minister of Lithuania, which held the EU council presidency until the start of 2014 and listed EIA as one of its priorities.

“We aimed at finding a reasonable and balanced agreement without fundamental changes of the underlying Directive. As a result minimum quality requirements for different elements of the EIA process will be established.”

The compromise text is understood to contain many elements of the commission’s original proposals, including a broader scope – encompassing sustainability, climate change, habitats and biodiversity; requirements to describe reasonable alternatives; a central role for competent experts; and to implement mitigation and compensation measures.

However, there remains a lack of clarity on how the text approaches screening and scoping. The council, commission and parliament have been advocating a late scoping process linked to the planning application process. However, IEMA warns that such an approach risks confusing industry and fails to recognise the value in an early scoping process.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

IEMA Impact: Shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

Lisa Pool on how IEMA is shaping a sustainable future with impact assessment

27th November 2023

Read more

IEMA responded in September to the UK government’s consultation on the details of the operational reforms it is looking to make to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) consenting process as put forward in the NSIP reform action plan (February 2023).

24th November 2023

Read more

Members of IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network Steering Group have published the 17th edition of the Impact Assessment Outlook Journal, which provides a series of thought pieces on the policy and practice of habitats regulations assessment (HRA).

26th September 2023

Read more

In July, we published the long-awaited update and replacement of one of IEMA’s first published impact assessment guidance documents from 1993, Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.

1st August 2023

Read more

Are we losing sight of its intended purpose and what does the future hold for EIA? Jo Beech, Tiziana Bartolini and Jessamy Funnell report.

15th June 2023

Read more

Luke Barrows and Alfie Byron-Grange look at the barriers to adoption of digital environmental impacts assessments

1st June 2023

Read more

Susan Evans and Helen North consider how Environmental Statements can be more accessible and understandable

1st June 2023

Read more

IEMA’s Impact Assessment Network is updating its advice note on non-technical summaries (NTS).

31st May 2023

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close