The big question: What are the greatest barriers to biodiversity net gain working in practice?

30th August 2019


Web p17 question

Related Topics

Related tags

  • Central government ,
  • Stakeholder engagement ,
  • Biodiversity

Author

Richard Collinson

Three professionals discuss our September big question.

Tom Butterworth

Biodiversity technical director, WSP

“The lack of resources within local authorities is significant“

Biodiversity net gain is a new method for assessing change in biodiversity, and a relatively new requirement for development. As a result, there are bound to be teething problems. Having said this, I don't think that there are any barriers – I see them as hurdles to get over, rather than things blocking our way. Making biodiversity net gain mandatory for all new developments and standardising the method will create the clarity developers need. We have been told that the government's Environment Bill and the updated metric from Natural England will resolve these issues.

The lack of resources within local authorities is significant. Biodiversity net gain does not require a huge uplift in time from local authorities, but it does require someone with ecological expertise to check planning applications and oversee delivery. This expertise is needed for existing requirements, but many authorities do not have adequate access. Biodiversity net gain will add to this need. Biodiversity net gain can often be delivered within the development site. Where this is not possible, an offset or compensation can be used. At the moment, most local planning authorities do not have a process for identifying and setting up these compensation measures; they need support and, potentially, start-up funding to help set up these processes.

Dr Julia Baker CEnv CIEEM

Writing in a personal capacity

“Social impacts of biodiversity net gain are rarely accounted for“

People are intimately connected with nature and can suffer or benefit from biodiversity net gain. For example, people at a development site could lose a public park and live too far from the biodiversity offset to benefit. Conversely, residents of a development can enjoy enriched natural surroundings when biodiversity net gain is achieved within the housing footprint.

The problem is that the social impacts of biodiversity net gain are rarely accounted for and, when they are, it is not in a comprehensive way that safeguards or enhances wellbeing. We must ensure that protecting and enhancing biodiversity through development 'does no harm' to people. This is also an opportunity for infrastructure development to generate long-term benefits for the environment and society.

More than 50% of stakeholders mentioned social justice when asked about biodiversity offsetting as a conservation tool for England, so this is an issue we must address. International principles on the 'people' aspects of biodiversity net gain were published in 2018; these include avoiding negative social impacts, and designing, building and maintaining biodiversity net gain in ways that are fair and inclusive for people. There is a working group looking at how these 'people' principles can apply within the UK – watch out for updates!

Nick Blyth

Policy and engagement lead, IEMA

“Net gain is not possible if irreplaceable habitats are impacted“

The government is committed to mandate net gains for biodiversity in the Environment Bill. In July, it published a formal response to the consultation, stating, for example, that a 10% net gain will be mandated, with a two-year transition period. There are some welcome points, including recognition of concerns about net gain driving habitat degradation prior to applications and a statement to address this.

Responses to the consultation expressed strong support for protecting irreplaceable habitat and protected sites and species, as well as for the mitigation hierarchy approach. These and many other concerns are all addressed in Biodiversity net gain – Good practice principles for development, developed by IEMA with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management and the Construction Industry Research and Information Association. This guidance is clear concerning claims of net gain and how it is not possible if irreplaceable habitats are impacted.

We anticipate with interest further government proposals on how these and other issues will be addressed, as well as government developments concerning the wider ambition of environmental net gain. What is clear is that professional sustainability and environmental skills will be central to good net gain outcomes.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

BNG requirements could absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year

The UK’s new biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements could create 15,000 hectares of woodlands, heath, grasslands, and wetlands and absorb 650,000 tonnes of carbon each year.

13th March 2024

Read more

All major housing developments in England will be required by law to deliver at least a 10% increase in biodiversity under new rules that came into force today.

12th February 2024

Read more

As we approach the 40th anniversary of the Born Free Foundation, co-founder Will Travers OBE tells Chris Seekings how a new approach to conservation is needed to end animal suffering

1st February 2024

Read more

Ajirioghene Samuel looks at some exciting tree-planting initiatives, offering nature-based solutions to climate change impacts

1st February 2024

Read more

The UK should become the first G20 country to mandate financial disclosures on nature to propel widespread adoption by the private sector, according to an influential lobby group.

24th January 2024

Read more

The government is largely “off track” in meeting legally binding targets with nature in danger of “irreversible” decline, according to a highly critical report by the environmental watchdog.

24th January 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close