Petrol leak costs Tesco £8m

19th June 2017


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Retail and wholesale ,
  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Air ,
  • Control

Author

IEMA

Tesco has been prosecuted for leaking 23,500 litres of petrol into the sewerage system and local rivers in Lancashire.

The incident, in July 2014, led to residents having to seek medical help after petrol odours coming from the sewer network gave them headaches and nausea. The smell affected residents up to 1km away.

Some of the petrol also entered Langwood Brook and the River Irwell. More than 40 dead fish were found within 2.5 kilometres of where the pollution entered the watercourse, and anglers reported dead fish more than ten kilometres downstream.

The leak was caused by Tesco’s failure to address a known issue with part of the fuel delivery system and an inadequate alarm system at a petrol station operated by the retailer in Haslingden, north of Manchester, according to the Environment Agency. The supermarket’s emergency procedures were also found to be poor, the regulator said.

The incident sparked a multi-agency operation involving the Environment Agency, Lancashire County Council, United Utilities, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service and Lancashire Police.

Around 23,500 litres of unleaded petrol leaked from the tank over a 29-hour period. Some 7,000 litres was recovered at the site and the remainder escaped into the sewer system and watercourse.

Mark Easedale, an environment manager for the Environment Agency, said: ‘This pollution incident had a dramatically negative impact on the local community and the environment, with Langwood Brook and the River Irwell severely affected.’

A week after the incident, officers from the regulator found that fish populations downstream of the Langwood Brook were around 90% lower than those found upstream, he added.

A spokesperson for Tesco said: ‘We sincerely regret the fuel spillage incident at our petrol station in Haslingden and we’re sorry for the impact it had on the local environment, our customers and the community.

‘This was a deeply unfortunate isolated incident and one for which we have taken full responsibility,’ he said.

Tesco has inspected other petrol stations and introduced real-time monitoring systems to prevent similar incidents, he added.

The prosecution was brought jointly by the Environment Agency and Lancashire County Council.

Tesco pleaded guilty and was charged under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 and Contravention of Regulation 6(8) of the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 contrary to s.33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at work Act 1974.

The supermarket was fined £3m for the environmental offence, and £5m for the health and safety breach. It was also ordered to pay costs of £35,434 to the Environment Agency and £22,000 to Lancashire County Council.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

SBTi clarifies that ‘no change has been made’ to its stance on offsetting

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

IEMA presents a digital campaign to share knowledge and inspire action in sustainability

2nd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close