In court: April 2016

7th April 2016


Related Topics

Related tags

  • Business & Industry ,
  • Water ,
  • Pollution & Waste Management ,
  • Control

Author

IEMA

Thames Water receives six-figure financial penalty

Aylesbury Crown Court has fined Thames Water £380,000 for polluting a watercourse in Buckinghamshire with sewage. The company was also ordered to pay costs of £23,092 and a victim surcharge of £120.

The court was told that an Environment Agency officer performing an routine fish survey of Horsenden stream in February 2013 discovered the pollution. He was forced to stop work for his own welfare because of the amount in the watercourse, part of the River Thame catchment area in the Chilterns. The pollution was traced to Thames Water’s Princes Risborough sewage treatment works. Agency officers found further discharges during a site visit on 5 March 2013, when the sewage in places looked like feathers, and on 19 July 2013, which was caused by a blockage at the works.

The Recorder of Aylesbury, Judge Sheridan, said were it not for the initial survey, the incidents were unlikely to have come to light. The agency blamed management failures at the site for the incidents, which it said were ongoing. It described as lamentable the failings at the treatment works and confirmed that the shortcomings had caused the site to breach its permit several times between February and July 2013.

An agency investigation found that inlet screens, designed to prevent debris entering the treatment works and causing blockages, were not working and the storm tank pump was broken. Although the permit allowed Thames Water to discharge sewage during storms as long as stringent conditions were met, the agency said the site’s weir was set too low, allowing discharges of effluent when it should have been passing through the works for treatment.

Agency officer Holly Linham said: ‘One of the officers had never seen sewage fungus in a stream that bad before. A biological survey of the stream noted that the impact of the sewage was chronic and was likely to have been prevalent for some time. The conditions observed during visits were not isolated incidents. Logbook entries suggest ongoing discharges and other problems at a site that was struggling to cope.’

Thames Water pleaded guilty to the offences at Wycombe Magistrates’ Court on 5 August 2015 and was committed to Aylesbury Crown Court for sentencing. The firm has since changed the management structure at the site and raised the storm weir.

In January, Thames Water was fined a record £1 million after it repeatedly polluted the Wendover Arm of the Grand Union Canal with sewage from its Tring treatment works between July 2012 and April 2013.

Subscribe

Subscribe to IEMA's newsletters to receive timely articles, expert opinions, event announcements, and much more, directly in your inbox.


Transform articles

Weather damage insurance claims hit record high

Weather-related damage to homes and businesses saw insurance claims hit a record high in the UK last year following a succession of storms.

18th April 2024

Read more

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has issued a statement clarifying that no changes have been made to its stance on offsetting scope 3 emissions following a backlash.

16th April 2024

Read more

One of the world’s most influential management thinkers, Andrew Winston sees many reasons for hope as pessimism looms large in sustainability. Huw Morris reports

4th April 2024

Read more

Vanessa Champion reveals how biophilic design can help you meet your environmental, social and governance goals

4th April 2024

Read more

Alex Veitch from the British Chambers of Commerce and IEMA’s Ben Goodwin discuss with Chris Seekings how to unlock the potential of UK businesses

4th April 2024

Read more

A project promoter’s perspective on the environmental challenges facing new subsea power cables

3rd April 2024

Read more

Senior consultant, EcoAct

3rd April 2024

Read more

Around 20% of the plastic recycled is polypropylene, but the diversity of products it protects has prevented safe reprocessing back into food packaging. Until now. David Burrows reports

3rd April 2024

Read more

Media enquires

Looking for an expert to speak at an event or comment on an item in the news?

Find an expert

IEMA Cookie Notice

Clicking the ‘Accept all’ button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies. Our website uses necessary cookies which are required in order to make our website work. In addition to these, we use analytics and third-party cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click ‘Settings’. To learn more about cookies, how we use them on our website and how to change your cookie settings please view our cookie policy.

Manage cookie settings

Our use of cookies

You can learn more detailed information in our cookie policy.

Some cookies are essential, but non-essential cookies help us to improve the experience on our site by providing insights into how the site is being used. To maintain privacy management, this relies on cookie identifiers. Resetting or deleting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.

Essential cookies

These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.

Analytics cookies

These cookies allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors to our website and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works.

Advertising cookies

These cookies allow us to tailor advertising to you based on your interests. If you do not accept these cookies, you will still see adverts, but these will be more generic.

Save and close